Acer Predator PO7-640

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 225%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PO7-640  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO7-640
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 07:36
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 91%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 76.6
1-Core 221
2-Core 437
125% 245 Pts
4-Core 841
8-Core 1,652
147% 1,246 Pts
64-Core 2,944
182% 2,944 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Sapphire(174B A612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 472.80
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Lighting 287
Reflection 261
Parallax 292
234% 280 fps
MRender 321
Gravity 235
Splatting 178
192% 245 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 196%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 737 419 418 421 423 419 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,745
Write 1,632
Mixed 1,469
SusWrite 473
298% 1,330 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 237
4K Mixed 78.9
315% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1204
DQ Write 1188
DQ Mixed 1,005
807% 1,132 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 248%
Great: 235%
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite 1TB
567GB free
Firmware: 82C6U67A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1521 2184 2180 2182 2181 2182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
404% Outstanding
Read 2,706
Write 1,951
Mixed 1,687
SusWrite 2,072
471% 2,104 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 227
4K Mixed 98.9
353% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,447
DQ Write 1,293
DQ Mixed 253
495% 998 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 404%
Great: 453%
Asmt 2235 1TB
756GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 473 470 469 469 469 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 429
Mixed 416
SusWrite 467
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 39.3
130% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 89
95% 158 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 96%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 182 183 184 184 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 170
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 183
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Seagate One Touch HDD 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 124 124 126 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
62% Good
Read 91.8
Write 110
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 124
74% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
199% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 62%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5200C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
137% Outstanding
MC Read 53.3
MC Write 53.1
MC Mixed 50
149% 52.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 51.4
SC Mixed 27.7
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 137%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PO7-640 Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO7-640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $812
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback