Asrock Z97 Extreme6/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme6/3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150319
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateOct 16 '17 at 06:58
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 420
56% 419 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 116
Parallax 97.6
92% 109 fps
MRender 97.7
Gravity 98.6
Splatting 98.4
80% 98.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 360
Write 227
Mixed 273
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 12.3
80% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.1
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 41.8
46% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 94%
WD WD6400AAVS-00G9B1 640GB
548GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 84.6
Write 81.1
Mixed 78.3
61% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.31
88% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB
225GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 60.6
Write 58.6
Mixed 58.2
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.36
86% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.1% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.1
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Extreme6/3.1 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme6/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $721
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback