Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171121
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 01:09
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 74
1-Core 101
2-Core 186
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 523
55% 439 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 39.1
32% 40.2 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 28.4
29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1122 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4162000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 96 82 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
77% Very good
Read 409
Write 97.7
Mixed 240
SusWrite 94.3
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 39.7
137% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 193
168% 252 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77%
Great: 94%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$112
734GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 482 482 482 482 465 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 479
Mixed 423
SusWrite 479
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 50
166% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 118%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback