AZW Gemini M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAZW Gemini M  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW Gemini M
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '22 at 14:38
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 42.7
1-Core 59.2
2-Core 119
41% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 230
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.67 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 5.8
3% 4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 128GB 128GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2010XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 23 20 40 63 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 405
Write 123
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 37.1
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 1.2
55% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 54.9
DQ Mixed 1.6
25% 60.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 81%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
309GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 29.7
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 35
42% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17%
Great: 18%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 22.3
Mixed 11
16% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
42% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 12.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gemini M Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: AZW Gemini M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback