Today's hottest deals

Packard ixtreme M5740

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard ixtreme M5740  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard FMP55
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '17 at 11:29
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 94.2
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 149
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 370
40% 315 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320
Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Lighting 4.83
Reflection 6.31
Parallax 1.94
4% 4.36 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 3.23
Splatting 3.57
4% 4.36 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0911
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 34
Write 30.3
Mixed 31.7
24% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.29
100% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 97%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
585GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 95.8
Write 77.6
Mixed 73.3
62% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.33
92% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 57%
Maxtor 6V300F0 300GB
225GB free
Firmware: VA111630 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 62.6
Mixed 63.2
45% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.34
100% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 39%
Samsung G3 Station 2TB
561GB free, PID 6014
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 29.3
Mixed 18.9
33% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.39
90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18%
Great: 22%
Initio ST380021A 80GB
41GB free, PID 1040
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.3% Very poor
Read 20.8
Write 28.9
Mixed 16.7
29% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.28
55% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hitachi GU512303EP0202 GU502203EP0201 GU512303EP0202 GU502203EP0201 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ixtreme M5740 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Packard ixtreme M5740

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback