Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1200 APU 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 23% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Memory 27.1 1-Core 14.8 2-Core 24.6 15% 22.2 Pts	4-Core 24.6 8-Core 22.8 3% 23.7 Pts	64-Core 23.1 1% 23.1 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310 7,882 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AF0) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.74% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 0.5 1% 1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.74% Great: 1%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 438GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA41A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 93.2 Write 98.4 Mixed 50.1 60% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 76%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 8GB 5,792 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 4GB free, PID 556b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 28.7 Write 7.2 Mixed 8.5 15% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.8 117% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF25664HZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 4GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	8.53% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 2.6 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 272 15% 272 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.53% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 12%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 23%, 6,904 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7300 Series GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 103 samples	1x
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	1x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	1x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x

RAM
8KTF25664HZ-1G6M1 1x2GBMicronBench 20%, 650 samples	1x
DDR3 1600 8G Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 10GBKingstonBench 12%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16