Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '22 at 19:31
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 197
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 560
54% 447 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.8% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 37.6
30% 38.4 fps
MRender 36.1
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 0.1
18% 24.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 23 12 42 75 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 400
Write 313
Mixed 273
SusWrite 74.9
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 17.1
67% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 49.1
DQ Mixed 40.9
40% 66.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 55%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$26
97GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 154 97 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 481
Write 332
Mixed 342
SusWrite 157
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 33.9
131% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 195
172% 256 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 91%
Seagate Basic 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9340
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 133 133 134 133 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 95.2
Write 118
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 132
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.8
215% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
77GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 93 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 172
Write 142
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 97.5
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 28.4
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 23.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback