Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JP_X509JP

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JP_X509JP (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509JP
Memory	5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210812
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '22 at 17:59
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	61%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Memory 53.3 1-Core 58.4 2-Core 91 41% 67.6 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 170 26% 189 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1BAF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	2.93% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 3.7 2% 3.5 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 3.7 Splatting 4.9 4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.93% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 272 244 244 264 271 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 716 Write 536 Mixed 382 SusWrite 277 106% 478 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 37.3 129% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 501 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 390 303% 417 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 153%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 325GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 118 116 117 120 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 63.4 Write 73.7 Mixed 63.9 SusWrite 117 59% 79.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.4 123% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 01BA M4S08S681LJJJ43-12 12GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 11.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 4.2 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JP_X509JP Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JP_X509JP

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	116x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	27x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	80x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples	45x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	18x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	31x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 512GBNvmeBench 169%, 2,949 samples	23x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	14x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	32x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	29x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16