Today's hottest deals

Casper EXCALIBUR G770

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G770  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NLAI 001
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200914
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateOct 16 '22 at 12:50
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
70% 128 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 614
62% 500 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Quanta(152D 1246) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.7% Average
Lighting 49.6
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 52.2
40% 54.5 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 43.9
41% 51.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 47%
Intel UHD Graphics
Quanta(152D 1244) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 0.3
5% 21.8 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 6
Splatting 12.3
8% 8.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 42 50 53 58 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 432
Write 251
Mixed 319
SusWrite 56.2
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 32.4
120% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 31.8
DQ Mixed 18.8
50% 113 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 91%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB
459GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 73 64 75 73 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 126
Write 135
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 75.1
70% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.5
231% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 5.8
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EXCALIBUR G770 Builds (Compare 3,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback