Intel S2600CO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel S2600CO  (all builds)
Memory123.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '22 at 18:00
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2658 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 123
46% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 438
40% 335 Pts
64-Core 1,090
68% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3212) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.1% Below average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 33.6
Parallax 56.4
37% 45 fps
MRender 29.7
Gravity 46.6
Splatting 23.3
26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 520ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 116 112 116 116 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 340
Write 139
Mixed 185
SusWrite 116
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 25.6
89% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 136
105% 144 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$34
528GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 27 28 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 105
Write 38.6
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 26.2
37% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PDZ-1G6E1 16x8GB
16 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.3% Very good
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 32.4
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S2600CO Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Intel S2600CO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback