Wortmann_ag TERRA_SERVER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_SERVER  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel S2600CWR
Memory35.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '22 at 23:31
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 146
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 530
49% 410 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$230
EVGA(3842 3551) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Lighting 118
Reflection 93
Parallax 106
97% 106 fps
MRender 85.3
Gravity 76.2
Splatting 68.6
62% 76.7 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 36 33 34 31 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.2% Poor
Read 186
Write 52.5
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 34.5
19% 85 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 10.9
42% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 79.2
77% 127 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 114%
Avago MR9363-4i 600GB
26GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 72 71 70 74 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 50% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 5x8GB
5 of 16 slots used
40GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.9% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 8
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_SERVER Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_SERVER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Very poor Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback