Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD/USB3  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 18 '22 at 20:33
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 270-$20
AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 54.9
1-Core 45.9
2-Core 79.4
38% 60.1 Pts
4-Core 87.6
8-Core 88.4
12% 88 Pts
64-Core 87.8
5% 87.8 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
MSI(1462 809F) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2
Parallax 0.4
2% 1.47 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 285 255 298 298 320 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 258
Write 210
Mixed 252
SusWrite 286
57% 252 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 30.3
99% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 37.2
DQ Write 93.5
DQ Mixed 54.3
45% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RM51264BA1339.16FM 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback