TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Q505UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Q505UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q505UAR
Memory18.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '22 at 08:21
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 38.9
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 102
43% 74 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 261
27% 216 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 35.2%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1B00) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 5.4
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 6.1
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 4.24%
 Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
860GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 327 350 347 340 338 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 306
Write 335
Mixed 309
SusWrite 334
73% 321 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 25
76% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 150
134% 203 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 66.8%
 Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 859B CT16G4SFD832A.M16FJ 24GB
2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.3% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 34.3%
 Great: 76%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Q505UAR Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q505UAR

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples104x
GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples99x
GTX 950Nvidia  $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples3x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples1x
SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples11x
MX500 1TBCrucial  $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples5x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples5x
RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GBMicronBench 55%, 309 samples49x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GBMicronBench 53%, 137 samples32x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 2,683 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback