Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 00:54
Run Duration575 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 95.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 233
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 710
68% 563 Pts
64-Core 901
56% 901 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$75
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 26.9
Reflection 29
Parallax 34.9
22% 30.3 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 30
Splatting 20
21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ex-2tb PRO 2TB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AAU1RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1368 1172 427 752 673 345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,448
Write 2,189
Mixed 1,581
SusWrite 789
391% 1,752 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 72.9
230% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 417
DQ Mixed 570
426% 575 MB/s
Poor: 244%
This bench: 244%
Great: 389%
Asgard AN3 2TNVMe-M.2/80 2TB
221GB free
Firmware: FWSS0104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1641 911 353 1029 890 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,376
Write 1,946
Mixed 126
SusWrite 850
241% 1,074 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 75.8
247% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 461
DQ Mixed 589
452% 622 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 212%
Great: 403%
Asgard AN3 2TNVMe-M.2/80 2TB
431GB free
Firmware: FWSS0104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 765 737 735 285 400 547 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 982
Write 1,920
Mixed 938
SusWrite 578
250% 1,104 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 34.7
139% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 462
DQ Mixed 580
384% 449 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 134%
Great: 363%
Ex-1tb PRO 1TB
215GB free
Firmware: 42A8T4EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 309 300 303 299 297 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 317
Write 297
Mixed 310
SusWrite 296
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 63.7
204% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 455
309% 378 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 110%
Great: 375%
P3-2TB 2TB
332GB free
Firmware: T0731A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 223 249 244 240 232 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 471
Write 405
Mixed 395
SusWrite 238
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 29.7
127% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 49.4
95% 185 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83%
Great: 104%
Gigabyte UD PRO 512GB-$47
124GB free
Firmware: SAFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 218 111 202 209 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 476
Write 441
Mixed 379
SusWrite 191
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 39.3
139% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 208
194% 299 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 104%
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
189GB free
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 178 179 156 155 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 387
Write 301
Mixed 338
SusWrite 167
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 24.8
87% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 86.7
DQ Mixed 111
85% 117 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 65%
3 1TB SSD 1TB
60GB free
Firmware: S1011A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 212 216 195 198 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 468
Write 408
Mixed 255
SusWrite 203
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 13.3
67% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 26.6
75% 155 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 100%
Asgard AN3 1TNVMe-M.2/80 1TB
334GB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 166 175 145 82 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 340
Write 295
Mixed 101
SusWrite 147
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 61.7
203% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 457
310% 379 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 101%
Great: 377%
P3-2TB 2TB
373GB free
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 292 289 293 259 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
623GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 83 82 88 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 78.1
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 85
51% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 88%
USB FLASH DRIVE 4GB
0GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 104
Write 6
Mixed 6.7
30% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Mixed 0
89% 8 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
181GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 71 59 75 75 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 73.7
Write 65
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 67.3
88% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB-$165
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 45.1
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 24.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback