MSI MS-7512

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardMSI MS-7512  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '17 at 14:02
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5450-$299
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 65.6
39% 57.4 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 126
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B E810) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
9.08% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 9.77
Parallax 8.31
10% 9.91 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 8.33
Splatting 12.8
8% 9.72 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.08%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sg9xcs2d200geibm 43W7745 42C0546IBM 200GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SA03SE6H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.6% Poor
Read 136
Write 58.3
Mixed 80.9
20% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 8.22
58% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 56.6
DQ Mixed 7.5
15% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 41%
Samsung HE642JJ 640GB
257GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 69.7
Mixed 36.7
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.4
115% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7512 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-7512

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback