Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_X515JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_X515JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JAB
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '23 at 14:52
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 152
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 201
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4
Parallax 6.2
5% 5.4 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 8.5
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 206 194 200 188 185 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 889
Write 750
Mixed 748
SusWrite 211
145% 650 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 48.8
165% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 622
DQ Write 464
DQ Mixed 541
405% 542 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 124%
Great: 189%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A1G43DB0-CPB 12GB
3200, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.6
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 11.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_X515JA Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_X515JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback