Today's hottest deals

Colorful H310M-T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemColorful H310M-T  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful H310M-T
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 13 '23 at 11:11
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 306
44% 325 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.69% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 7.8
6% 6.4 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 13.5
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.69%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499
MSI(1462 5052) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 238
Reflection 214
Parallax 205
194% 219 fps
MRender 248
Gravity 160
Splatting 130
141% 179 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 161%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$99
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 447 440 292 406 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 470
Mixed 412
SusWrite 393
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 47.3
154% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 326
246% 329 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
769GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 182 179 179 178 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 173
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 177
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
518GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 40 38 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 44.6
Write 39.3
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 39.4
50% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 859B CB4GU2666.C8FT 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.7% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 21
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M-T Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

System: Colorful H310M-T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $746
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback