Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 19:59
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 38.4
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 136
34% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 203
26% 199 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 5.1
4% 4.57 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 6.7
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac G535N-KS 256G 256GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 183 186 58 61 93 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
Read 288
Write 233
Mixed 234
SusWrite 130
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 11.5
43% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 174
136% 186 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 49%
SDXC Card 513GB
141GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 19 19 12 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 56.3
Write 15.7
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 17
28% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
40% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 53D512M64D4RQ-046 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.6% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback