Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889 6,638 User benchmarks, average bench 47% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	47.1% Average	Memory 62.2 1-Core 67 2-Core 123 50% 84 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 193 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.2% Poor	Lighting 35.1 Reflection 43.4 Parallax 31 29% 36.5 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 27.1 28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 305GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 28 29 31 28 31 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR3 2133 2OZ DDR3 2133 2OZ 2133 CL11 Series 2133 CL11 Series 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2134, 2134, 2134, 2134 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.7% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 17.4 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 11.4 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	4x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	1x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $129Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,140 samples	1x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	1x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16