Lenovo 20240

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20240  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G505
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130515
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 27 '23 at 12:43
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Memory 45.8
1-Core 20.3
2-Core 28.7
23% 31.6 Pts
4-Core 58
8-Core 68.1
8% 63 Pts
64-Core 69.5
4% 69.5 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
Legend(17AA 3802) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 2.3
1% 2.07 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 185 270 256 283 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
51% Above average
Read 298
Write 250
Mixed 216
SusWrite 249
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 15.2
59% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 121
94% 129 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 51%
Great: 128%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
736GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 94 93 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 74.4
Write 55.2
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 94.1
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata HY7YG1B1674ZM 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 533 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20240 Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback