HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 897B
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 12:14
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
62% Good
Memory 59.4
1-Core 145
2-Core 262
82% 155 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 583
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 897B) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 13.2
10% 14.2 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 15.1
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BH1 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1187 1054 954 996 260 375 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,211
Write 1,293
Mixed 1,094
SusWrite 804
248% 1,101 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 68.4
237% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,123
DQ Write 977
DQ Mixed 1,083
803% 1,061 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 217%
Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-091.A00G Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 33.7
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 21.7
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback