HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 836B
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 07:12
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25% Poor
Memory 38.4
1-Core 24.2
2-Core 47.7
24% 36.8 Pts
4-Core 67.6
8-Core 72.3
9% 69.9 Pts
64-Core 66.7
4% 66.7 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 836B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6194
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 2.4
2% 4.27 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.5
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 546 249 282 213 154 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 871
Write 773
Mixed 716
SusWrite 264
147% 656 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 17.6
57% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 117
88% 117 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74%
Great: 193%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
919GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 161 158 167 164 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 138
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 163
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
206% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 HP26D4S9S8ME-8 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.1
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx Builds (Compare 2,484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback