Today's hottest deals

HP ENVY Desktop TE02-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemHP ENVY Desktop TE02-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 894B
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '23 at 10:18
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 87
1-Core 209
2-Core 411
123% 236 Pts
4-Core 804
8-Core 1,456
136% 1,130 Pts
64-Core 2,803
174% 2,803 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$450
HP(103C 8771) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
153% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 214
Parallax 197
183% 212 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 155
Splatting 139
132% 165 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 153%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$79
788GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 350
Write 381
Mixed 348
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 43.3
142% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 153
165% 277 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1006 1TB
917GB free
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,373
Write 1,635
Mixed 1,358
326% 1,455 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 70.5
241% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,114
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 850
604% 789 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 275%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U2S8MR-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 38.9
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 28.8
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY Desktop TE02-0xxx Builds (Compare 803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 189%
UFO

System: HP ENVY Desktop TE02-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $731
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback