Medion P15811

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemMedion P15811  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NH55RCQM
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '23 at 14:05
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 215
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 541
56% 448 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8550) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3179
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.1% Good
Lighting 85.5
Reflection 90.1
Parallax 78.2
70% 84.6 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 77.2
Splatting 71.8
65% 80.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme E12-512G-PHISON- 512GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1413 557 547 545 547 549 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,293
Write 1,712
Mixed 1,285
SusWrite 693
281% 1,246 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 55.7
170% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 587
DQ Write 569
DQ Mixed 690
488% 615 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 173%
Great: 218%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
273GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 88 89 91 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 98.3
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 88.9
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
154% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905663-031.A00G 859B CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 13.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P15811 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: Medion P15811

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback