ADD TO PC
BUILD

Medion P15811

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	67.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	Medion P15811 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION NH55RCQM
Memory	17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190917
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '23 at 18:55
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 115 2-Core 214 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 548 58% 461 Pts	64-Core 589 36% 589 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1E39 A010) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.75% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 7.2 Parallax 7.1 5% 6.77 fps	MRender 8.5 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 11.9 7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.75% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Clevo(1558 8550) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.2% Good	Lighting 83 Reflection 92.5 Parallax 79 68% 84.8 fps	MRender 97.6 Gravity 77.6 Splatting 72.3 66% 82.5 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme E12-512G-PHISON- 512GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 301GB free (System drive) Firmware: 22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 751 555 543 548 553 541 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Read 446 Write 1,652 Mixed 1,308 SusWrite 582 228% 997 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 82 4K Mixed 50.5 160% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 672 DQ Write 494 DQ Mixed 590 439% 585 MB/s
Poor: 133% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 218%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 150GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 64 65 65 65 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 120 Write 102 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 65.3 69% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 0.8 280% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905663-031.A00G 859B CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60% Good	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 19.1 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 22.3 SC Mixed 18.9 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical P15811 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 40%

Jet ski

System: Medion P15811

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	11x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	13x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	8x

SSD
E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B27-BB1 512GBBench 178%, 586 samples	6x
E12-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 1TBBench 210%, 324 samples	4x
E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 512GBBench 182%, 656 samples	4x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	10x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FDD1 16GBHynixBench 71%, 36 samples	3x
9905663-031.A00G 859B CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 24GBKingstonBench 51%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback