Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170510
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 02 '23 at 20:39
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$228
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 86.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 236
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 588
64% 506 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.3% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 134
Parallax 120
102% 126 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 129
Splatting 109
95% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1249 1239 1465 1567 1564 1565 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,191
Write 2,003
Mixed 1,670
SusWrite 1,442
410% 1,826 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 63.8
207% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 914
DQ Write 585
DQ Mixed 824
594% 774 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 274%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
542GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1944 1989 1302 1144 1157 1159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,265
Write 2,022
Mixed 1,565
SusWrite 1,449
409% 1,825 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 65
209% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 771
DQ Mixed 920
679% 898 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 284%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 187 190 188 188 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 143
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 188
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3,704
Write 3.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 3.6
664% 929 MB/s
4K Read 158
4K Mixed 0
9,844% 78.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK00 32TB
24TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 203 223 236 236 233 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 93.9
Write 210
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 220
197% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.5
243% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB-$182
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 19.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 23.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 1,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $622
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback