Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM_FX706HM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive326% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM_FX706HM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX706HM
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230303
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJun 09 '23 at 14:17
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 67.7
1-Core 158
2-Core 310
94% 179 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 997
93% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,300
80% 1,300 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 141C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4369
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
7.16% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 117
Parallax 11.3
8% 46 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 0
6% 8.23 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.16%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1442 1244 1348 1076 968 859 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2,393
Write 2,307
Mixed 1,780
SusWrite 1,156
428% 1,909 MB/s
4K Read 73
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 99.2
346% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,262
DQ Write 1,112
DQ Mixed 1,172
883% 1,182 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 326%
Great: 326%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
36.4% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 10
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM_FX706HM Builds (Compare 653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM_FX706HM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback