HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8653
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '23 at 17:49
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	49%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$161 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 232 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 467 55% 428 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.30 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.3% Average	Lighting 52.2 Reflection 73.3 Parallax 46.2 42% 57.2 fps	MRender 40.4 Gravity 48 Splatting 43 36% 43.8 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv128g KIOXIA 128GB 792 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 32 33 40 34 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 649 Write 70.7 Mixed 224 SusWrite 32.8 53% 244 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 28.4 4K Mixed 32 97% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 188 158% 235 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 143%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 217GB free Firmware: MS2OA8L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 77 82 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 175 Write 117 Mixed 41.6 SusWrite 80 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE M378A1K43DB2-CTD 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3200, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	62.4% Good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 20.3 65% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 16.6 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 89.4 45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,073 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500AMD $140Bench 81%, 16,466 samples	1,337x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	462x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	331x

GPU
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	1,062x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	821x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	222x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 169%, 5,284 samples	235x
hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GBSKBench 146%, 8,367 samples	222x
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	189x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	218x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	203x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	167x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16