Today's hottest deals

Asrockrack EPC602D8A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrockrack EPC602D8A  (all builds)
Memory76.4 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '23 at 12:40
Run Duration325 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 155
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 568
53% 439 Pts
64-Core 1,154
71% 1,154 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 79.6
Parallax 76.5
0% 52.1 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 61.1
54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$85
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 75 76 80 73 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
WDC WD4003FFBX-68MU3N0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 142 140 141 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 230
Write 214
Mixed 102
SusWrite 141
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 1.2
8% 3.63 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 5.3
DQ Mixed 3.3
2% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 27%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$200
233GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1355 1194 1191 1181 1191 1185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,687
Write 1,478
Mixed 858
SusWrite 1,216
293% 1,310 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 42.1
139% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 345
257% 342 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 200%
Great: 302%
WD WD101KFBX-68R56N0 10TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 141 140 141 142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B4G70BM0- 4x24GB
4 of 8 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 30.8
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EPC602D8A Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrockrack EPC602D8A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback