Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B660M MORTAR (MS-7D42)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D42
MotherboardMSI MAG B660M MORTAR (MS-7D42)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 12:19
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 46.8
1-Core 210
2-Core 417
110% 224 Pts
4-Core 832
8-Core 1,413
136% 1,123 Pts
64-Core 2,335
144% 2,335 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
MSI(1462 7D42) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
7.94% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 10.6
7% 11.2 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 10.4
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.94%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
143GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 325
Write 412
Mixed 349
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 29.7
96% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 154
167% 280 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$55
882GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 91.8
Mixed 67.1
65% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$124
172GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 107
Mixed 26
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G56C46U5.M8G1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.5% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 24.1
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 14
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B660M MORTAR (MS-7D42) Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MAG B660M MORTAR (MS-7D42)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback