Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 303%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 282%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics331% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory39.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '23 at 14:59
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 140
2-Core 274
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 878
85% 700 Pts
64-Core 1120
69% 1120 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Asus(1043 889D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
331% Outstanding
Lighting 498
Reflection 544
Parallax 690
406% 577 fps
MRender 502
Gravity 547
Splatting 299
353% 449 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 331%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$139
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,360
Write 1,146
Mixed 547
225% 1,018 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 46.3
161% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 670
DQ Mixed 703
553% 771 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
477GB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1941 2284 2267 2300 2296 2288 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 1,866
Write 2,203
Mixed 1,929
SusWrite 2,229
466% 2,057 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 67.1
218% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 985
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 874
623% 806 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 313%
Great: 419%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$82
122GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 127 126 128 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 109
Write 67.6
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 128
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Corsair CMG32GX4M2E3200C16 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Corsair CMG32GX4M2E3200C16 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 26.2
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 43.1
SC Mixed 29.4
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 27" 2560 1440 MSI3CA6 MSI MAG272CQR
Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $1,014
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback