Razer Blade 17 (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0406

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive584% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 17 (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0406  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA770
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '23 at 13:13
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 64.3
1-Core 135
2-Core 333
90% 177 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 1,024
101% 824 Pts
64-Core 1,272
79% 1,272 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 3004) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3667
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 189
Parallax 174
147% 181 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 140
Splatting 120
115% 144 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 129%
Great: 144%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S880 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12237
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3645 3620 3537 4127 4161 4174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
584% Outstanding
Read 4,005
Write 4431
Mixed 2,998
SusWrite 3,877
863% 3,828 MB/s
4K Read 76.1
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 114
384% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,717
DQ Write 1,347
DQ Mixed 1211
993% 1,425 MB/s
Poor: 271%
This bench: 584%
Great: 625%
Fanxiang S880 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SN12237
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3780 4142 4152 3830 4126 4165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
606% Outstanding
Read 4,076
Write 4,082
Mixed 2,742
SusWrite 4,032
841% 3733 MB/s
4K Read 76.9
4K Write 246
4K Mixed 109
387% 144 MB/s
DQ Read 1,961
DQ Write 1,532
DQ Mixed 1,430
1,156% 1641 MB/s
Poor: 271%
This bench: 606%
Great: 625%
External USB3.0 DISK02 500GB
465GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 94 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 83.3
Write 90.6
Mixed 59
SusWrite 94
112% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 27.6
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 17.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 17.2" 1536 841 AUOA988
Typical Blade 17 (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0406 Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 17 (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0406

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback