Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81F5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81F5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 06:18
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Memory 38.8
1-Core 9.5
2-Core 48
20% 32.1 Pts
4-Core 95.6
8-Core 165
16% 130 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 396B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 7.9
6% 7.3 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 7
Splatting 10.7
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S500PRO 512GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 984 916 524 498 483 324 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 819
Write 825
Mixed 1,084
SusWrite 622
189% 837 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 36.5
125% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 98.6
DQ Mixed 135
100% 135 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 116%
Great: 307%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
869GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 115 113 117 115 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 859B CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FJ 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.6% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0757
Typical 81F5 Builds (Compare 1,201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81F5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback