HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 897B
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 09:51
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1245U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 33.1
1-Core 159
2-Core 304
81% 165 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 752
78% 628 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 897B) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 12.9
10% 14.1 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 14.5
14% 17 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BH7 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3TGXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 753 1025 774 929 728 609 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 854
Write 609
Mixed 625
SusWrite 803
162% 723 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 20
76% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 406
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 312
221% 288 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 119%
Great: 426%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 237
17% 237 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 12 85 25 60 13.9" 1296 759 CMN143D
Typical EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback