Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 838F
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1550 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '23 at 14:22
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 176
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 557
52% 430 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Lighting 28.6
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 31.4
23% 32.9 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 20.1
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,569
Write 1,206
Mixed 895
271% 1,224 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 48.7
160% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 591
429% 563 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
300GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 109 108 108 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 124
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 108
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.M8FR Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22.5
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 20.2
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 75%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 165 27" 1280 720 IVM6682 PL2766H
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback