Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16P6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GL63 8RC
MotherboardMSI MS-16P6  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 16:38
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 217
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 465
54% 418 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1219) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 5.8
4% 13.8 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8.4
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 136 143 110 77 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 434
Write 386
Mixed 338
SusWrite 105
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 25.2
96% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 203
178% 264 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.M8FR Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P6 Builds (Compare 1,345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback