Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 5 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	15.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140605
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '23 at 15:02
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 55.3 2-Core 116 49% 80.2 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 281 30% 242 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	7.97% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 5.4 Parallax 12.5 3% 7.13 fps	MRender 52.9 Gravity 10.3 Splatting 9.5 18% 24.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 7.97% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$90 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 633GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 264 279 258 221 339 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 300 Write 285 Mixed 280 SusWrite 269 64% 283 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 29.9 97% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 39.7 DQ Write 79 DQ Mixed 52.1 42% 56.9 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 137%
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB 7,893 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4GB free Firmware: SBFA15.5 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 224 Write 118 Mixed 142 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 13.9 47% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 29.7 DQ Write 20.5 DQ Mixed 22.4 18% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 342GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 74 99 102 75 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 150 Write 144 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 90.2 75% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 107%
WD Elements 2621 1TB 6,342 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 162GB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 69 70 47 68 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 119 Write 102 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 65.6 111% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.2 151% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 66%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08WN4A0 1TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 191GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 79 80 53 79 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 156 Write 154 Mixed 96.9 SusWrite 74.5 157% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 134% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 67%
WDC WD15 EARS-60MVWB0 1.5TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 309GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 79 80 53 79 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 82.8 Write 81.1 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 74.2 98% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 4,160 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 12.7 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 8.3 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 98.4 41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 39: 0P 3R 5G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
39%	13%	128	179	22	75	21.5"	1280 720	PHLC154 PHL 223V7

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	155x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	110x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	65x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	24x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	11x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $517

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16