HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B1D
Memory14.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230328
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 18:41
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-13100F-$88
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 68.2
1-Core 173
2-Core 307
97% 183 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 780
81% 651 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.5% Good
Lighting 87.8
Reflection 86.2
Parallax 79.8
72% 84.6 fps
MRender 88.9
Gravity 75.5
Splatting 68.8
63% 77.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1006 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1164 1415 1473 1441 1531 1565 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 2,095
Write 1,195
Mixed 1362
SusWrite 1,431
340% 1,521 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 34.5
142% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,007
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 260
271% 470 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 239%
Great: 413%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
844GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 112
Write 109
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 18.7
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
173% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 25A3 20TB
13.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 190 190 187 194 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 181
Mixed 140
SusWrite 186
233% 170 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 1.3
385% 4.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 1.5
441% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 118%
WD easystore 2624 5TB
300GB free, PID 2624
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 37 38 37 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 54.7
Write 57.7
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 36.9
63% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556C40-8 KF556C40-8 HP52U40S6MA-8FRAE 24GB
4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 29.4
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.8
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 35 16 60 21.5" 1536 839 AOC2269 2269W
Typical OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-1xxx Builds (Compare 210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback