Oegstone Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemOegstone Q87M-E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150325
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 18:36
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 194
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 529
52% 427 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 54.8
46% 56.4 fps
MRender 41.1
Gravity 50.5
Splatting 46.3
38% 46 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253256GB 256GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 39 129 25 103 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 364
Write 377
Mixed 372
SusWrite 86.5
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 25.1
106% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 39
DQ Mixed 0.4
28% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 101%
INTEGRAL 1TB
632GB free
Firmware: 0213
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 348 363 365 367 363 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.8% Good
Read 291
Write 332
Mixed 341
SusWrite 344
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 29.9
90% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 154
114% 151 MB/s
Wd1004fbyz-23yc 00MX125D7A09664LEN 1TB
919GB free
Firmware: WH08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 192 190 191 183 198 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 214
Mixed 117
SusWrite 190
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
406% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 31 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC208 PHL 271E1
Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback