Oegstone Q87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Oegstone Q87M-E (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory	22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150325
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '23 at 20:53
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	43.5% Average	Memory 57.6 1-Core 59.5 2-Core 78.3 42% 65.1 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 405 32% 282 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCB) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.5% Below average	Lighting 41.6 Reflection 58.4 Parallax 36.9 34% 45.6 fps	MRender 42.2 Gravity 51.5 Splatting 47.3 39% 47 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253256GB 256GB 779 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 51 109 49 161 115 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29% Poor	Read 106 Write 54 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 113 16% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 10.3 27% 8.87 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 49.9 81% 153 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 101%
Wd1004fbyz-23yc 00MX125D7A09664LEN 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 687GB free Firmware: WH08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 156 156 157 174 169 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 63.3 Write 223 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 163 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.7 173% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	40.9% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 14.4 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	89	74	75	27"	1280 720	PHLC208 PHL 271E1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Oegstone Q87M-E

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	13x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	9x
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	7x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	12x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	7x

SSD
T253256GB 256GBTeamBench 75%, 779 samples	5x
Ultimate SU800 512GBAdata $71Bench 104%, 31,280 samples	2x
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 250GBBench 92%, 5,131 samples	2x

RAM
99U5403-160.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 649 samples	6x
Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 32GBSamsungBench 46%, 6 samples	4x
99U5403-160.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 708 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $114

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353