Today's hottest deals

Casper EXCALIBUR G911

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G911  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NLZE 001
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 16:55
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 137
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 416
45% 356 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Quanta(152D 1506) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.01
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.1% Average
Lighting 43.7
Reflection 56.5
Parallax 70.5
36% 56.9 fps
MRender 87
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 63.2
58% 71.6 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2746 2716 2283 2594 2789 2366 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 1,636
Write 3,282
Mixed 1,834
SusWrite 2,583
531% 2,334 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 64.2
206% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 661
DQ Mixed 850
624% 825 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 324%
Great: 516%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB
15GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20.4
Write 3.5
Mixed 2
7% 8.63 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
27% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G52C42S5.M16GB 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 5200 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92% Outstanding
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 39.6
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 24.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0A1F
Typical EXCALIBUR G911 Builds (Compare 247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G911

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback