Today's hottest deals

Casper EXCALIBUR G911

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 165%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G911  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NLZE 001
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230921
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateJun 17 '24 at 00:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 80
1-Core 218
2-Core 418
124% 239 Pts
4-Core 780
8-Core 1,341
128% 1,060 Pts
64-Core 2,955
183% 2,955 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 113%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Quanta(152D 1505) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 179
Parallax 221
162% 199 fps
MRender 286
Gravity 168
Splatting 120
148% 191 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 146%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
765GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1276 995 1043 1014 864 372 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 1,829
Write 3,939
Mixed 2,300
SusWrite 927
510% 2,249 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 254
4K Mixed 75.4
311% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,578
DQ Write 1,167
DQ Mixed 1,343
1,012% 1,363 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 285%
Great: 419%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G52C42S5.M16GB 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
173% Outstanding
MC Read 70.9
MC Write 69.3
MC Mixed 65.9
196% 68.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 30.4
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 173%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0A1F
Typical EXCALIBUR G911 Builds (Compare 247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G911

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback