Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 17:00
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 70.3
1-Core 154
2-Core 309
93% 178 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 831
88% 703 Pts
64-Core 1067
66% 1067 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$269
Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.3% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 124
Parallax 108
91% 114 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 92.5
86% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-wave(p) 256G 256GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10178
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 329
Write 366
Mixed 339
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 24.2
104% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 6.5
DQ Mixed 11.6
23% 50 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 232%
Kingmax 120GB 120GB
36GB free
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 266 222 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 478
Write 421
Mixed 350
SusWrite 191
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 22.2
128% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 30.5
73% 150 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 86%
VRX M.2 NVME 2280 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: APF1M3R1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 376 376 377 376 377 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 375
Write 368
Mixed 375
SusWrite 376
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 64.7
210% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 420
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 707
446% 502 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 122%
Great: 329%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
172GB free
Firmware: JU000D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 147
Write 112
Mixed 56
SusWrite 85.1
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
164% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 27.2
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 23.8" 1280 720 VSC623B VX2418-P FHD
Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $466
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback