PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z420 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1589 |
Memory | 115.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191029 |
Uptime | 26.7 Days |
Run Date | Dec 22 '23 at 18:00 |
Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K5200
HP(103C 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 85 71 52 97 98 MB/s
|
64.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 187 178 170 166 181 MB/s
|
89%
Excellent
|
|||
Intel Raid 5 Volume 7.5TB
6TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 320 311 310 320 319 MB/s
|
||||
13.9%
Very poor
|
||||
SSK Storage 1TB
823GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 18 19 MB/s
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
87.1%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 15 | 200 | 23 | 60 | 0" | 1280 720 | SPT13C0 X505BV-FMQC |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,567x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 813x |
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 728x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 514x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 315x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 275x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $370 |