HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-aa0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-aa0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C16
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240125
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 31 '24 at 17:33
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 53
1-Core 155
2-Core 324
90% 177 Pts
4-Core 686
8-Core 1,028
107% 857 Pts
64-Core 991
61% 991 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
HP(103C 8C16) 1GB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4727
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 51
16% 31.3 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 40.7
28% 33.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA1T0TFH-1BC1AABHA 1TB
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1610 1353 1281 1287 1889 1903 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2965
Write 1,823
Mixed 1702
SusWrite 1,554
448% 2,011 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 60.4
196% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 490
354% 469 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 295%
Great: 496%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G56BK7BX068 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
159% Outstanding
MC Read 65.7
MC Write 54.1
MC Mixed 70.9
182% 63.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 29.8
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 159%
Great: 159%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 16" 1280 720 BOE0BFA
Typical Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-aa0xxx Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-aa0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback