Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_X409JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_X409JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409JA
Memory1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210611
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '24 at 13:32
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 144
58% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 200
23% 178 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1EB1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 5
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EVM25/512GB 512GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0220A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 353 118 40 20 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 424
Write 383
Mixed 378
SusWrite 170
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 20.6
95% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 47.7
80% 150 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 859B CB8GS2666.C8TT 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 84 55 60 13.9" 1366 768 CMN14D6
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_X409JA Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_X409JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback