Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime7 Days
Run DateApr 18 '24 at 02:49
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$111
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 83.7
1-Core 168
2-Core 334
104% 195 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 989
101% 815 Pts
64-Core 1,201
74% 1,201 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
ASRock(1849 5233) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 140
Parallax 324
116% 202 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 153
Splatting 216
170% 208 fps
Poor: 125%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1XHE-00AFY0 1TB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614600WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,185
Write 4,212
Mixed 3,236
865% 3,878 MB/s
4K Read 72.9
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 107
385% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1,765
DQ Write 1,367
DQ Mixed 1,602
1,189% 1,578 MB/s
Poor: 226% Great: 607%
Addlink SATA SSD 512GB
30GB free
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 268 263 265 263 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 455
Write 432
Mixed 322
SusWrite 292
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 4.3
44% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 108%
Walram 1TB 1TB
111GB free
Firmware: V0629A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 453 450 448 7.9 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 445
Mixed 436
SusWrite 331
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 26.3
152% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 38.7
86% 171 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.5% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 24.5
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 31.5" 1280 720 VSC0A3A VX3268-PC-mhd
Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 4,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $466
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback