Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '24 at 20:51
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$240
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 155
2-Core 310
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 619
8-Core 1,196
108% 908 Pts
64-Core 1,177
73% 1,177 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 106%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
Asus(1043 05E7) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.10.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 150
Parallax 297
122% 199 fps
MRender 274
Gravity 171
Splatting 227
183% 224 fps
Poor: 125%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1137 861 866 858 851 858 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,448
Write 2,112
Mixed 1,440
SusWrite 905
385% 1,726 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 82.5
278% 97.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,629
DQ Write 1,158
DQ Mixed 1,182
940% 1,323 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 301%
Great: 346%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
346GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2176 838 794 807 820 820 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,593
Write 2,297
Mixed 1,628
SusWrite 1,042
422% 1,890 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 87.4
288% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,769
DQ Write 1,426
DQ Mixed 1,531
1,164% 1,575 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 328%
Great: 346%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$34
902GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 190 188 187 191 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 110
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 189
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 27.3
100% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 46
SC Mixed 30.8
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 55.4
72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM735C SAMSUNG
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback