Asus ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MJ_Q543MJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MJ_Q543MJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N6506MJ
Memory15.3 GB free of 24 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 07:06
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 46.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 232
66% 128 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 794
76% 629 Pts
64-Core 1314
81% 1314 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Asus(1043 3698) 1GB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5008
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 25.8
19% 20.5 fps
MRender 19.8
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 34.6
24% 29 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00-1102 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1472 1235 1139 1546 1607 1532 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,826
Write 1,340
Mixed 1269
SusWrite 1,422
328% 1,464 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 40.9
135% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 589
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 260
225% 344 MB/s
Poor: 219%
This bench: 219%
Great: 358%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC56BD1 Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N 24GB
5600, 5600 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 45.4
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 24.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 303
13% 303 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 108%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 211 54 60 15.5" 1920 1080 SDC4161
Typical ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MJ_Q543MJ Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MJ_Q543MJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback