Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 10:39
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 113
54% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 184
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500
Sapphire(174B E163) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4
Parallax 3.4
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 135 137 137 133 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 443
Write 372
Mixed 326
SusWrite 142
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 19.8
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 36.3
71% 142 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 92%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 186 186 186 187 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 170
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 185
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 108%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 HMT425U6AFR6A-PB HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 HMT425U6AFR6A-PB 8GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.9% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 9.4
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 7 60 40" 1280 720 SAM0B30 SAMSUNG
Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback